![]() I really hope you do realize that, it’s toxic. You’d need quite a bit in order to get your money’s worth, so just smoke it and let us know when you find out it’s not a worthwhile high. That’s personal amounts, even a ball is personal to the right addict. No matter how well you make it, it’s not going to be great, and you’re going to lose lots of money if you aren’t handling ounces of cocaine at a time. One thing I will tell you, DO NOT SELL THIS SHIT. 60 is reasonable no matter where I go, though I’ve gotten it for less with heavier cut. That’s coming from someone who traveled all over, from where it should be purest in Florida, to NC, to California. The most you can hope for is 70-80% purity generously.) is about $60 here in the states, I think that’s about £37. A reasonably priced gram, with minimum cut (you’re never going to find pure cocaine unless you make it yourself or head out to Peru. ![]() If you’re in the UK, I have no idea how much a gram of coke will cost you. I’d suggest you do the same, but if you’re insistent on making it, you might as well do it properly. Tried making crack several times and failed most, gave up. I used to have a big problem with coke, and that problem was not having it as often as I’d like. Of course with average purity cocaine you will be left with a rock of 0.04g after doing this, still up for it? still into taking cocaine, wait your dealer gets the best peruvian flake and its 85% pure :bigsmile::biggreen::satisfied you muppet, you believe that bullshit, he’s cooked it up for you? did he mention using extra bicarb 60% so your rock is only 0.9% cocaine? You could alternately use ammonia or ether, dissolve the cocaine hydrocloride in the liquid and gently evaporate off the liquid leaving you with purified base cocaine, be careful ether is explosive when heated (so is ammonia for that matter), this method will leave you with pure rocks which were what got people into smoking the shit to start with. ![]() Cocaine is about 4% average street purity, to cook with bicarb add 30% bicarb to mixture and wash this will result in a crack rock of about 2.5% purity, this is why people think crack is shit these days, two years ago an average crack rock would be at least double this. Here is test_dir directory listing: $ ls -alĭrwxrwsr-x 5 user group 4096 Sep 7 17:10. Uid=1002(user3) gid=1002(user3) groups=1002(user3),1003(group)Ĭreated test_dir and added the setgid bit permission: $ mkdir test_dirĭrwxrwsr-x 5 user group 4096 Sep 7 17:10 test_dirĬreated files & directories in test_dir using created users: $ cd test_dir We have created multiple users with the name user1, user2, user3: $ useradd user1Īlso created a group with the name group: $ groupadd groupĪdded group as a secondary group in created users: $ usermod -a -G group user1 We can set this by other way as mentioned below $ chmod g+s test_dir With this above command we gave full privileges on it to it's owner and to the user that are members of the group the directory belongs to plus read and execute permission for all the other users. If we want to set the setgid bit on a directory use below command. This is often used to ease the sharing of files (files will be modifiable by all the users that are part of said group). ![]() When used on a directory, instead, the setgid bit alters the standard behavior so that the group of the files created inside said directory, will not be that of the user who created them, but that of the parent directory itself. In the first case, the file which has the setgid bit set, when executed, instead of running with the privileges of the group of the user who started it, runs with those of the group which owns the file. The setgid bit has effect on both files and directories. rw- 1 ivan ivan 0 Sep 7 18:54 can achieve this by using special permission " setgid bit". webdev sudo chmod g+w ls -ld teĭrwx-w- 2 ivan webdev 4096 Sep 7 18:53 chmod g+rx sudo chmod g+s ls -ld teĭrwxrws- 2 ivan webdev 4096 Sep 7 18:53 cd umask touch ls -l Ivan adm cdrom sudo dip plugdev lpadmin sambashare kvm sudo chown. (and for the setgid bit not working) umask mkdir ls -ld teĭrwx- 2 ivan ivan 4096 Sep 7 18:53 umask groups If they have the requirement of a 077 umask, then they need to come up with an efficient way of sharing the files for you. In short - some of us think the "S" in "ITS" stands for service. Or, the files are mounted by an internal-only samba share - kind of overkill, but samba easily allows a specific group and permission model vs. You'll need to get the administrator to mount it with the proper umask explicitly set so you can share files. What may work is if the shared storage area is mounted on a different file system. The setgid bit won't help you - it only affects ownership, not what the owner can do with the file.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |